A structure for composing and revising the Dk kernel.
BSDK studies how functions, modules and their relationships can form a coherent base for Dk. Its central question is how a system can evolve while the parts built on it remain understandable.
The proposed base structure makes functional relationships part of the model, supporting explicit interfaces, dependency analysis and revision.
A useful foundation gives future contributors a way to examine and improve the system beyond the choices of its first authors.
A practical example
A revised module should make it possible to identify which dependent functions need review before the change is adopted. This is an illustration of the proposed design.
Why this exists
BSDK is the base structure the intelligence grows from — the part that decides what the rest can become.
The argument in full is on the manifesto; the economy page states plainly what contributing here earns and what it does not.
What is published here
Motions for resolution. Not a specification.
All proposed resolutions presented here are solutions to the requirements of Dk and the Drayker platform, and only those requirements are final. The motions illustrate what should be done; the definitive architecture is expected to be structured around optimal solutions proposed and developed with metaprogramming intelligent algorithms and research organized through DFMP and other methods.
That distinction is the point of this repository, not a disclaimer on it. A structure decreed once is a structure that cannot learn.
How it fits the whole
BSDK is the structural layer Dk stands on: the DNA-like base structure the kernel is assembled from, and the part that decides what the rest can become.
Everything above it leans on what this structure decides. DFM gives it the shared vocabulary — the same language of functions and modules the method cuts work into is the language this base structure is proposed in. Dk is assembled from it — the intelligence cores, from the mini core of Dk Personal to the full core of Dk Global, are composed out of the pieces BSDK defines; OSDK and UID are consumed through it; and because the structure is meant to evolve without discarding what still works, the whole ecosystem inherits that property. A structure decreed once is a structure that cannot learn — BSDK exists to be the opposite of that.
The equation and the research behind it
The definitive form of BSDK is the super equation: the base structure that compresses the behavior of the network and the Dk. The research suggests its predictive modeling may be beyond human capacity alone — which is why the work is expected to be carried out by Meta DFM, the evolutionary research and development super-agent. The equation is open research; the agent that will help find it is part of the same design.
State of this documentation
Thin. This page and the repository state the purpose and the ground rule; the motions themselves are not published yet. If you are looking for a place where careful architectural writing would immediately matter, it is here.
Contributing
Open an issue with the motion you want to argue for — that is how a resolution enters the process. Issues small enough for one person to finish carry the open-function label and appear on the board at drayker.org.
Related: dk · dk-network · dfmp
English is the canonical language of this documentation; read other languages through automatic translation. Native translation and localization are planned for the Drayker sites.
Content licensed CC BY 4.0. Drayker is a non-profit organization, and its work is primarily voluntary. DAF is proposed governance architecture; current founding governance is documented in draykerdk/.github.